Comparing
fix/e007-positional-context-bd-0x73.21.6
(9627258
) withmain
(15bf24c
)+20%
- Improvement
- 11
- Untouched
- 49
- Skipped
- 18
Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data. For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments, which may affect the accuracy of the results. Learn more about regression causes.Benchmarks
18 total
The benchmarks below were skipped, so their baseline results are used instead. If they were deleted in your codebase, archive them to remove them from the performance reports.
Learn more about archiving benchmarks
Learn more about archiving benchmarks
parse_10k_bad_indicators_lenient
benches/error_handling_benchmarks.rs::error_handling_benches::benchmark_parse_10k_bad_indicators_lenientSkipped
90.4 ms*
parse_10k_clean_strict
benches/error_handling_benchmarks.rs::error_handling_benches::benchmark_parse_10k_clean_strictSkipped
90.7 ms*
read_10k_records
benches/marc_benchmarks.rs::benches::benchmark_read_10kSkipped
86.3 ms*
read_1k_records
benches/marc_benchmarks.rs::benches::benchmark_read_1kSkipped
9.1 ms*
read_10k_with_field_access
benches/marc_benchmarks.rs::benches::benchmark_read_with_field_access_10kSkipped
88 ms*
read_1k_with_field_access
benches/marc_benchmarks.rs::benches::benchmark_read_with_field_access_1kSkipped
9 ms*
roundtrip_10k_records
benches/marc_benchmarks.rs::benches::benchmark_roundtrip_10kSkipped
219.9 ms*
roundtrip_1k_records
benches/marc_benchmarks.rs::benches::benchmark_roundtrip_1kSkipped
20.8 ms*
serialize_1k_to_json
benches/marc_benchmarks.rs::benches::benchmark_serialization_to_json_1kSkipped
26.8 ms*
serialize_1k_to_xml
benches/marc_benchmarks.rs::benches::benchmark_serialization_to_xml_1kSkipped
32 ms*
parallel_2x_10k_records
benches/parallel_benchmarks.rs::parallel_benches::benchmark_parallel_2x_10kSkipped
180.8 ms*
parallel_2x_1k_records
benches/parallel_benchmarks.rs::parallel_benches::benchmark_parallel_2x_1kSkipped
18 ms*
sequential_4x_1k_records
benches/parallel_benchmarks.rs::parallel_benches::benchmark_sequential_4x_1kSkipped
35.3 ms*
parallel_8x_1k_records
benches/parallel_benchmarks.rs::parallel_benches::benchmark_parallel_8x_1kSkipped
71.1 ms*
sequential_2x_10k_records
benches/parallel_benchmarks.rs::parallel_benches::benchmark_sequential_2x_10kSkipped
172.9 ms*
parallel_4x_10k_records
benches/parallel_benchmarks.rs::parallel_benches::benchmark_parallel_4x_10kSkipped
362.3 ms*
sequential_2x_1k_records
benches/parallel_benchmarks.rs::parallel_benches::benchmark_sequential_2x_1kSkipped
18.7 ms*
parallel_4x_1k_records
benches/parallel_benchmarks.rs::parallel_benches::benchmark_parallel_4x_1kSkipped
35.7 ms*
Commits
Click on a commit to change the comparison rangeBase
main
15bf24c
+19.81%
Enrich E007 IoError with positional context on mid-record reads
9627258
5 days ago
by dchud