Comparing
bd-7dre-repeated-control-fields
(6f120ea
) withmain
(4de08b6
)-10%
- Regression
- 1
- Untouched
- 59
- Skipped
- 16
Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data. For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.No successful run was found on main ( 6f120ea) during the generation of this report, so 4de08b6 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.
Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments, which may affect the accuracy of the results. Learn more about regression causes.Benchmarks
76 total
test_pipeline_parallel_2x_10k_threaded
tests/python/test_benchmark_pipeline_parallel.py::TestProducerConsumerPipelineBasic-10%
44.8 ms50 ms
test_write_only_10k_rustfile
tests/python/test_benchmark_writing.py::TestRustFileBackendBenchmarks+6%
53.2 ms50 ms
test_pipeline_parallel_4x_10k_threaded
tests/python/test_benchmark_pipeline_parallel.py::TestProducerConsumerPipelineBasic+6%
110.6 ms104.4 ms
test_write_only_1k_rustfile
tests/python/test_benchmark_writing.py::TestRustFileBackendBenchmarks+5%
4.4 ms4.2 ms
test_sequential_reading_1k
tests/python/test_benchmark_parallel.py::TestPythonParallelBenchmarks+4%
9.9 ms9.5 ms
test_file_sequential_1x_10k
tests/python/test_benchmark_parallel.py::TestFileBatchParallelBenchmarks+4%
87.4 ms83.9 ms
test_backend_comparison_1k
tests/python/test_benchmark_writing.py::TestBackendComparison+4%
52.1 ms50 ms
test_sequential_2x_reading_1k
tests/python/test_benchmark_parallel.py::TestPythonParallelBenchmarks+4%
15.4 ms14.8 ms
test_read_10k_records
tests/python/test_benchmark_reading.py::TestReadingBenchmarks+4%
76.5 ms73.7 ms
test_sequential_10k
tests/python/test_benchmark_parallel.py::TestPythonParallelBenchmarks+4%
78.6 ms75.8 ms
test_file_sequential_2x_10k
tests/python/test_benchmark_parallel.py::TestFileBatchParallelBenchmarks+4%
174.8 ms168.5 ms
test_collect_all_records_1k
tests/python/test_benchmark_reading.py::TestIterationBenchmarks+3%
7.5 ms7.2 ms
test_pipeline_sequential_extraction_4x_10k
tests/python/test_benchmark_pipeline_parallel.py::TestProducerConsumerPipelineWithExtraction+3%
106.7 ms103.1 ms
test_file_sequential_4x_10k
tests/python/test_benchmark_parallel.py::TestFileBatchParallelBenchmarks+3%
351.5 ms339.9 ms
test_read_and_extract_titles_10k
tests/python/test_benchmark_reading.py::TestReadingBenchmarks+3%
79 ms76.5 ms
test_process_8_files_parallel_4_threads
tests/python/test_benchmark_pipeline_parallel.py::TestProducerConsumerPipelineMultiFile+3%
227.9 ms221.4 ms
test_read_1k_records
tests/python/test_benchmark_reading.py::TestReadingBenchmarks+3%
7.5 ms7.3 ms
test_process_4_files_parallel_4_threads
tests/python/test_benchmark_pipeline_parallel.py::TestProducerConsumerPipelineMultiFile+2%
111.9 ms109.3 ms
test_sequential_2x_reading_10k
tests/python/test_benchmark_parallel.py::TestPythonParallelBenchmarks+2%
156.6 ms153.1 ms
test_iterator_vs_while_loop_1k
tests/python/test_benchmark_reading.py::TestIterationBenchmarks+2%
7.4 ms7.3 ms
test_sequential_4x_reading_1k
tests/python/test_benchmark_parallel.py::TestPythonParallelBenchmarks+2%
30.6 ms30 ms
test_read_and_extract_titles_1k
tests/python/test_benchmark_reading.py::TestReadingBenchmarks+2%
7.7 ms7.6 ms
test_write_only_10k_records
tests/python/test_benchmark_writing.py::TestWritingBenchmarks+2%
51.1 ms50.3 ms
test_write_pathlib_1k_rustfile
tests/python/test_benchmark_writing.py::TestRustFileBackendBenchmarks+1%
4.4 ms4.3 ms
test_threaded_reading_2x_10k
tests/python/test_benchmark_parallel.py::TestPythonParallelBenchmarks+1%
250.6 ms247.9 ms
Commits
Click on a commit to change the comparison rangeBase
main
4de08b6
+10.58%
Fix repeated control fields being dropped (closes #77)
1a88ad0
7 days ago
by dchud-11.24%
Skip pymarc parity tests when pymarc is not installed
1651a41
7 days ago
by dchud+19.85%
Remove unused get_control_field_values() accessor
d6c248b
4 days ago
by dchud-29.65%
Update CHANGELOG for repeated control fields fix (#77, #79)
6f120ea
4 days ago
by dchud