Comparing
split-best-method
(e5153c7
) withmain
(ef0f950
)-11%
- Regression
- 2
- Untouched
- 7
Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data. For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments, which may affect the accuracy of the results. Learn more about regression causes.Benchmarks
9 total
test_compare_scipy_cdist_vs_pymoors[2500]
pymoors/tests/benchmarks/test_distance_matrix_benchmark.py-11%
395.3 ms442.3 ms
test_compare_scipy_cdist_vs_pymoors[1000]
pymoors/tests/benchmarks/test_distance_matrix_benchmark.py-10%
25.2 ms28.2 ms
fast_non_dominated_sorting
moors/benches/fds.rs::benches::bench_fast_non_dominated_sorting0%
3.1 s3.1 s
nsga3_dtlz2_3obj
moors/benches/dtlz2.rs::benches::bench_nsga3_dtlz20%
2.9 s2.9 s
nsga2_zdt1
moors/benches/zdt1.rs::benches::bench_nsga2_zdt10%
2 s2 s
test_small_real_biobjective_nsag2
pymoors/tests/benchmarks/test_algorithms_benchmark.py-3%
4.5 s4.7 s
test_compare_scipy_cdist_vs_pymoors[2000]
pymoors/tests/benchmarks/test_distance_matrix_benchmark.py-7%
209.4 ms225.2 ms
test_cdist_pymoors
pymoors/tests/benchmarks/test_distance_matrix_benchmark.py-8%
3 s3.2 s
test_compare_scipy_cdist_vs_pymoors[1500]
pymoors/tests/benchmarks/test_distance_matrix_benchmark.py-9%
85.5 ms93.8 ms
Commits
Click on a commit to change the comparison rangeBase
main
ef0f950
-10.63%
Split best method for SOO and MOO
e5153c7
3 months ago
by andresliszt