Comparing
test-fixes-4
(0bf5eee
) withmain
(1e20520
)-33%
- Regression
- 1
- Untouched
- 35
Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data. For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments, which may affect the accuracy of the results. Learn more about regression causes.Benchmarks
36 total
test_benchmarks_lanczos_interp[kval-no_conserve_dc-run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py-33%
291.2 µs436.8 µs
test_benchmark_interpimage_flux_frac[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+11%
3 ms2.7 ms
test_benchmarks_metacal[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+3%
16.8 ms16.3 ms
test_benchmark_interpimage_flux_frac[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+3%
432.2 µs420.4 µs
test_benchmarks_interpolated_image[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+2%
3.8 ms3.8 ms
test_benchmark_spergel_init[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+2%
6.8 µs6.7 µs
test_benchmark_gaussian_init[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+2%
6.7 µs6.6 µs
test_benchmarks_interpolated_image[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+1%
39.7 ms39.4 ms
test_benchmark_gaussian_init[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py0%
102.5 µs102 µs
test_benchmark_moffat_init[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py0%
379 µs377.7 µs
test_benchmark_spergel_init[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py0%
103.4 µs103.1 µs
test_benchmark_spergel_calcfluxrad[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py0%
1.1 ms1.1 ms
test_benchmarks_metacal[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py0%
147.3 ms147.1 ms
test_benchmarks_lanczos_interp[xval-conserve_dc-run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py0%
880.7 µs880.6 µs
test_benchmark_spergel_conv[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py0%
2 s2 s
test_benchmark_moffat_conv_grad[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py0%
4.1 s4.1 s
test_benchmark_spergel_xvalue[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py0%
34.9 s34.9 s
test_benchmark_spergel_kvalue[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py0%
122.2 ms122.2 ms
test_benchmarks_lanczos_interp[xval-no_conserve_dc-run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py0%
828.8 µs828.9 µs
test_benchmark_moffat_conv[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py0%
2.3 s2.3 s
test_benchmarks_lanczos_interp[kval-conserve_dc-run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py0%
435.1 µs435.2 µs
test_benchmark_spergel_conv[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py-1%
156.8 ms157.9 ms
test_benchmark_invert_ab_noraise[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py-1%
140.3 µs142.2 µs
test_benchmarks_lanczos_interp[xval-no_conserve_dc-run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py-1%
110.1 µs111.7 µs
test_benchmark_spergel_kvalue[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py-2%
11.5 ms11.7 ms
Commits
Click on a commit to change the comparison rangeBase
main
1e20520
+49.68%
fix: better accuracy lanczos fourier-space interp
fb0f3fd
2 days ago
by beckermr-82.88%
perf: 2.3x is ok
89ff4d6
2 days ago
by beckermr-0.12%
test: put back submodule
0bf5eee
2 days ago
by beckermr