perf: better fitting approximations for spergel and moffat
#205Comparing
spergel-calc-max-rad-eff
(441abe5
) withmain
(d2f2d94
)-46%
- Improvement
- 2
- Regression
- 2
- Untouched
- 32
Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data. For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments, which may affect the accuracy of the results. Learn more about regression causes.Benchmarks
36 total
test_benchmarks_metacal[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py-46%
18.4 ms34.1 ms
test_benchmark_spergel_xvalue[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py-30%
1.6 s2.3 s
test_benchmarks_lanczos_interp[xval-no_conserve_dc-run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+49%
101.4 µs68.2 µs
test_benchmark_moffat_init[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+33%
83.1 µs62.4 µs
test_benchmarks_lanczos_interp[xval-conserve_dc-run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+18%
114.9 µs97.5 µs
test_benchmark_moffat_conv_grad[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+18%
892.5 ms758 ms
test_benchmark_invert_ab_noraise[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+17%
127.5 µs109.1 µs
test_benchmark_spergel_calcfluxrad[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+16%
195.9 µs169.2 µs
test_benchmark_rng_discard[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+15%
111.9 µs97.4 µs
test_benchmarks_lanczos_interp[kval-conserve_dc-run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+14%
45.5 µs39.8 µs
test_benchmark_invert_ab_noraise[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+13%
1.2 ms1.1 ms
test_benchmark_interpimage_flux_frac[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+12%
440.5 µs392.9 µs
test_benchmarks_lanczos_interp[kval-no_conserve_dc-run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+10%
45.1 µs40.9 µs
test_benchmark_interpimage_flux_frac[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+6%
2.4 ms2.3 ms
test_benchmark_rng_discard[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+3%
619.3 µs602.5 µs
test_benchmark_spergel_init[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+3%
6.2 µs6 µs
test_benchmark_spergel_init[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+1%
96.8 µs95.4 µs
test_benchmarks_interpolated_image[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py+1%
48.2 ms47.8 ms
test_benchmark_gaussian_init[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py0%
6 µs6 µs
test_benchmark_spergel_kvalue[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py0%
122.3 ms122.2 ms
test_benchmark_moffat_init[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py0%
358.5 µs358.2 µs
test_benchmarks_lanczos_interp[kval-conserve_dc-run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py0%
432.8 µs432.6 µs
test_benchmark_spergel_xvalue[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py0%
33.6 s33.6 s
test_benchmark_moffat_conv[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py0%
2.8 s2.8 s
test_benchmark_moffat_conv_grad[run]
tests/jax/test_benchmarks.py0%
6.3 s6.3 s
Commits
Click on a commit to change the comparison rangeBase
main
d2f2d94
+39.06%
perf: use a better routine maybe
401a586
20 days ago
by beckermr-38.73%
perf: this one is better
39474cc
20 days ago
by beckermr+43.64%
fix: do not include this file
f621e9b
19 days ago
by beckermr-0.01%
test: ensure we do not time the jit
02738e8
19 days ago
by beckermr-42.25%
perf: even faster and easier to make
5743628
19 days ago
by beckermr-1.76%
Merge branch 'main' into spergel-calc-max-rad-eff
ff8039a
19 days ago
by beckermr-0.75%
Merge branch 'main' into spergel-calc-max-rad-eff
a14cc7a
19 days ago
by beckermr-45.28%
debug: more hacking on this
441abe5
2 days ago
by beckermr