No successful run was found on develop (c84e522) during the generation of this report, so 86ebf3d was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.
Benchmarks
No benchmarks matched your searchTry adjusting your search or filter criteria.
Commits
Click on a commit to change the comparison range
Base
develop
86ebf3d
+43.03%
Revert "Support building duckdb from a hash, including CI (#6658)"