Comparing
update-rust-deps
(1427a7e
) withmaster
(c78dece
)×18
- Improvement
- 44
- Untouched
- 3
- Skipped
- 4
No successful run was found on master ( 399502c) during the generation of this report, so c78dece was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.
This report only contains results for the CPU Simulation instrument. To view results for the Wall Time instrument, click here.
Benchmarks
51 total
test_benchmark_score_samples[2-64-1024]
tests/test_isoforest.py+25%
6 ms4.8 ms
test_benchmark_score_samples[2-256-1024]
tests/test_isoforest.py+23%
18.5 ms15.1 ms
test_benchmark_score_samples[2-128-1024]
tests/test_isoforest.py+22%
10.1 ms8.3 ms
test_benchmark_score[1024]
tests/test_isoforest.py+22%
8.5 ms7 ms
test_benchmark_score[1048576]
tests/test_isoforest.py+21%
8.4 s6.9 s
test_benchmark_score_samples[1-256-1024]
tests/test_isoforest.py+20%
18 ms15.1 ms
test_benchmark_score_samples[1-256-1048576]
tests/test_isoforest.py+19%
17.9 s15 s
test_benchmark_score_samples[1-128-1024]
tests/test_isoforest.py+19%
9.8 ms8.3 ms
test_benchmark_score_samples[1-64-1024]
tests/test_isoforest.py+18%
5.6 ms4.8 ms
test_benchmark_score_samples[1-128-1048576]
tests/test_isoforest.py+18%
9.7 s8.3 s
test_benchmark_fit_sklearn[1024]
tests/test_isoforest.py+17%
5.3 s4.5 s
test_benchmark_fit_sklearn[128]
tests/test_isoforest.py+17%
668.1 ms570.6 ms
test_benchmark_score_samples[1-64-1048576]
tests/test_isoforest.py+16%
5.5 s4.7 s
test_benchmark_score_samples[4-256-1048576]
tests/test_isoforest.py+12%
17.9 s16 s
test_benchmark_score_samples[2-256-1048576]
tests/test_isoforest.py+12%
17.9 s16 s
test_benchmark_score_samples[4-128-1048576]
tests/test_isoforest.py+11%
9.7 s8.8 s
test_benchmark_score_samples[2-128-1048576]
tests/test_isoforest.py+11%
9.7 s8.8 s
test_benchmark_score_samples[2-64-1048576]
tests/test_isoforest.py+10%
5.5 s5 s
test_benchmark_score_samples[4-64-1048576]
tests/test_isoforest.py+10%
5.5 s5 s
test_benchmark_fit[128]
tests/test_isoforest.py+8%
491.1 ms452.7 ms
test_benchmark_fit[1024]
tests/test_isoforest.py+8%
4 s3.7 s
test_benchmark_score_sklearn[1048576]
tests/test_isoforest.py-4%
18.3 s19.1 s
The benchmarks below were skipped, so their baseline results are used instead. If they were deleted in your codebase, archive them to remove them from the performance reports.
Learn more about archiving benchmarks
Learn more about archiving benchmarks
test_benchmark_loss_gradient[1024-65536]
tests/test_aadforest.pySkipped
4.4 ms*
test_benchmark_loss_gradient[16384-1024]
tests/test_aadforest.pySkipped
125.9 ms*
test_benchmark_loss_gradient[1024-1024]
tests/test_aadforest.pySkipped
4.4 ms*
Commits
Click on a commit to change the comparison rangeBase
master
c78dece
×18
numpy 0.27.1, because it supports ndarray 0.17
1427a7e
3 months ago
by hombit