mtshiba:fix-build-failure - Branch - astral-sh/ruff

[ty] fix build failure caused by conflicts between #21683 and #21800

#21802Merged

Comparing

mtshiba:fix-build-failure

(

b0daf7c

) with

main

(

a9de6b5

)

-10%

Regression: 1

Untouched: 12

Skipped: 30

Archived: 9

No successful run was found on main ( 3511b7a) during the generation of this report, so a9de6b5 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

Benchmarks

52 total

ty_micro[many_string_assignments]

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/ty.rs::micro::benchmark_many_string_assignments

-10%

76.6 ms84.9 ms

ty_check_file[incremental]

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/ty.rs::check_file::benchmark_incremental

6.9 ms6.9 ms

anyio

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/ty.rs::project::anyio::project

1.4 s1.4 s

ty_check_file[cold]

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/ty.rs::check_file::benchmark_cold

136.9 ms136.8 ms

ty_micro[many_enum_members]

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/ty.rs::micro::benchmark_many_enum_members

125.3 ms125.3 ms

attrs

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/ty.rs::project::attrs::project

447.7 ms447.7 ms

DateType

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/ty.rs::project::datetype::project

254.6 ms254.6 ms

ty_micro[many_tuple_assignments]

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/ty.rs::micro::benchmark_many_tuple_assignments

65.7 ms65.8 ms

ty_micro[complex_constrained_attributes_1]

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/ty.rs::micro::benchmark_complex_constrained_attributes_1

67.2 ms67.3 ms

ty_micro[complex_constrained_attributes_3]

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/ty.rs::micro::benchmark_complex_constrained_attributes_3

70.9 ms71 ms

ty_micro[complex_constrained_attributes_2]

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/ty.rs::micro::benchmark_complex_constrained_attributes_2

66.8 ms67 ms

ty_micro[many_tuple_assignments]

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/ty.rs::micro::benchmark_tuple_implicit_instance_attributes

67 ms67.3 ms

hydra-zen

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/ty.rs::project::hydra::project

-1%

1.1 s1.1 s

The benchmarks below were skipped, so their baseline results are used instead. If they were deleted in your codebase, archive them to remove them from the performance reports.
Learn more about archiving benchmarks

formatter[pydantic/types.py]

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatter

Skipped

3.6 ms*

linter/default-rules[numpy/globals.py]

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rules

Skipped

210.1 µs*

linter/all-with-preview-rules[numpy/ctypeslib.py]

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rules

Skipped

5.2 ms*

linter/default-rules[numpy/ctypeslib.py]

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rules

Skipped

1 ms*

formatter[numpy/ctypeslib.py]

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatter

Skipped

1.9 ms*

linter/default-rules[pydantic/types.py]

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rules

Skipped

2.2 ms*

linter/default-rules[unicode/pypinyin.py]

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rules

Skipped

410.4 µs*

parser[numpy/ctypeslib.py]

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parser

Skipped

947.9 µs*

formatter[numpy/globals.py]

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatter

Skipped

248.6 µs*

formatter[large/dataset.py]

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatter

Skipped

9.7 ms*

linter/all-with-preview-rules[numpy/globals.py]

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rules

Skipped

835.1 µs*

formatter[unicode/pypinyin.py]

crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatter

Skipped

677.8 µs*

Commits

Click on a commit to change the comparison range

Base

main

a9de6b5

-9.71%

[ty] fix build failure caused by conflicts between #21683 and #21800

b0daf7c

2 months ago

by mtshiba

Home Terms Privacy Docs