Avatar for the astral-sh user
astral-sh
ruff
BlogDocsChangelog

[`pylint`] Implement `too-many-positional` (`PLR0917`)

#8995Merged
Comparing
flying-sheep:add-too-many-positional
(
372e369
) with
main
(
060a25d
)
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
Improvements
0
Regressions
0
Untouched
30
New
0
Dropped
0
Ignored
0

Benchmarks

Passed

linter/default-rules[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rules::linter/default-rules[pydantic/types.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
+4%
6.7 ms
6.4 ms
linter/all-with-preview-rules[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rules::linter/all-with-preview-rules[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
+3%
7.3 ms
7.1 ms
linter/all-rules[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rules::linter/all-rules[large/dataset.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
+2%
30.9 ms
30.2 ms
linter/all-with-preview-rules[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rules::linter/all-with-preview-rules[unicode/pypinyin.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
+1%
3.5 ms
3.5 ms
linter/all-with-preview-rules[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rules::linter/all-with-preview-rules[pydantic/types.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
+1%
14.9 ms
14.8 ms
linter/all-rules[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rules::linter/all-rules[unicode/pypinyin.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
3.3 ms
3.3 ms
linter/default-rules[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rules::linter/default-rules[numpy/globals.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
422.2 µs
421.3 µs
parser[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parser::parser[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
2.1 ms
2.1 ms
linter/default-rules[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rules::linter/default-rules[unicode/pypinyin.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
1.2 ms
1.2 ms
linter/default-rules[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rules::linter/default-rules[large/dataset.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
15.9 ms
15.8 ms
linter/all-rules[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rules::linter/all-rules[numpy/globals.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
937.1 µs
936.6 µs
linter/all-with-preview-rules[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rules::linter/all-with-preview-rules[numpy/globals.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
995.1 µs
995.1 µs
formatter[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatter::formatter[large/dataset.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
9.6 ms
9.6 ms
lexer[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexer::lexer[large/dataset.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
1.4 ms
1.4 ms
lexer[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexer::lexer[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
310.2 µs
310.2 µs
lexer[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexer::lexer[numpy/globals.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
45.5 µs
45.5 µs
lexer[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexer::lexer[pydantic/types.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
624.8 µs
624.8 µs
lexer[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexer::lexer[unicode/pypinyin.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
98.4 µs
98.4 µs
formatter[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatter::formatter[pydantic/types.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
3.5 ms
3.5 ms
formatter[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatter::formatter[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
1.9 ms
1.9 ms
formatter[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatter::formatter[unicode/pypinyin.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
676.9 µs
676.9 µs
parser[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parser::parser[unicode/pypinyin.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
759.1 µs
759.2 µs
parser[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parser::parser[numpy/globals.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
243.2 µs
243.2 µs
formatter[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatter::formatter[numpy/globals.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
252.1 µs
252.1 µs
linter/all-rules[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rules::linter/all-rules[pydantic/types.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
13.5 ms
13.5 ms
parser[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parser::parser[large/dataset.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
11.6 ms
11.6 ms
parser[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parser::parser[pydantic/types.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
4.5 ms
4.5 ms
linter/all-with-preview-rules[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rules::linter/all-with-preview-rules[large/dataset.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
34 ms
34.1 ms
linter/all-rules[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rules::linter/all-rules[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
-1%
6.6 ms
6.6 ms
linter/default-rules[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rules::linter/default-rules[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
-2%
3.2 ms
3.2 ms

Commits

Click on a commit to change the comparison range
Base
main
060a25d
0%
actually test setting
600032a
1 year ago
by flying-sheep
0%
Update fixes; change default to five
372e369
1 year ago
by charliermarsh
Home Terms PrivacyDocs