astral-sh
ruff
BlogDocsChangelog

Consider VS Code cell metadata to determine valid code cells

#12864Merged
Comparing
dhruv/vscode-language-id
(
142de81
) with
main
(
899a523
)
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
-4%
Improvements
1
Regressions
1
Untouched
30

Benchmarks

Failed

linter/default-rules[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rules
Regression
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
-4%
1.8 ms1.9 ms

Improved

linter/all-rules[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rules
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
+5%
765 µs726.4 µs

Passed

linter/all-with-preview-rules[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rules
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
+2%
2.5 ms2.5 ms
linter/all-rules[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rules
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
+1%
2.3 ms2.2 ms
linter/all-with-preview-rules[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rules
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
+1%
4.9 ms4.9 ms
linter/all-rules[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rules
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
8.1 ms8.1 ms
linter/all-with-preview-rules[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rules
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
9.7 ms9.7 ms
linter/all-with-preview-rules[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rules
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
19.3 ms19.2 ms
linter/default-rules[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rules
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
351.8 µs351.3 µs
red_knot_check_file[cold]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/red_knot.rs::check_file::benchmark_cold
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
39.2 ms39.1 ms
parser[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parser
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
309.1 µs309.1 µs
parser[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parser
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
4.9 ms4.9 ms
lexer[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexer
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
28.9 µs28.9 µs
lexer[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexer
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
73.9 µs73.9 µs
lexer[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexer
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
1.1 ms1.1 ms
lexer[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexer
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
216.3 µs216.3 µs
lexer[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexer
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
481.6 µs481.6 µs
formatter[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatter
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
1.8 ms1.8 ms
parser[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parser
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
911.6 µs911.6 µs
parser[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parser
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
2 ms2 ms
formatter[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatter
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
650.4 µs650.4 µs
formatter[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatter
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
240 µs240 µs
parser[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parser
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
101.8 µs101.8 µs
formatter[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatter
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
3.5 ms3.5 ms
formatter[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatter
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
9.3 ms9.3 ms
red_knot_check_file[incremental]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/red_knot.rs::check_file::benchmark_incremental
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
1.6 ms1.6 ms
linter/all-with-preview-rules[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rules
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
813.9 µs814.2 µs
linter/all-rules[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rules
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
4.1 ms4.1 ms
linter/default-rules[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rules
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
914.6 µs917.9 µs
linter/all-rules[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rules
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
16.3 ms16.4 ms
linter/default-rules[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rules
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
188.9 µs189.8 µs
linter/default-rules[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rules
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
-1%
3.6 ms3.7 ms

Commits

Click on a commit to change the comparison range
Base
main
899a523
+5.43%
Consider VS Code cell metadata for Jupyter Notebooks
11c222c
1 year ago
by dhruvmanila
-9.52%
Add roundtrip test case, use simple `HashMap`
142de81
1 year ago
by dhruvmanila
© 2025 CodSpeed Technology
Home Terms Privacy Docs