Comparing
cjm/rollback
(5d3ff98
) withmain
(bb40c34
)0%
- Untouched
- 13
- Skipped
- 30
- Archived
- 9
Benchmarks
30 total
The benchmarks below were skipped, so their baseline results are used instead. If they were deleted in your codebase, archive them to remove them from the performance reports.
Learn more about archiving benchmarks
Learn more about archiving benchmarks
formatter[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatterSkipped
233.9 µs*
linter/all-with-preview-rules[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rulesSkipped
19.5 ms*
lexer[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexerSkipped
217.4 µs*
lexer[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexerSkipped
486.1 µs*
formatter[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatterSkipped
1.9 ms*
formatter[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatterSkipped
3.5 ms*
formatter[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatterSkipped
652.7 µs*
formatter[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatterSkipped
9.4 ms*
lexer[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexerSkipped
74.6 µs*
lexer[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexerSkipped
1.1 ms*
linter/all-with-preview-rules[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rulesSkipped
738.8 µs*
parser[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parserSkipped
920.1 µs*
parser[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parserSkipped
105 µs*
parser[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parserSkipped
317.8 µs*
parser[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parserSkipped
1.9 ms*
linter/all-rules[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rulesSkipped
3.9 ms*
linter/all-rules[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rulesSkipped
16.2 ms*
linter/default-rules[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rulesSkipped
2.1 ms*
linter/all-with-preview-rules[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rulesSkipped
9 ms*
linter/default-rules[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rulesSkipped
4.2 ms*
linter/all-rules[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rulesSkipped
648.9 µs*
linter/all-with-preview-rules[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rulesSkipped
4.6 ms*
linter/all-rules[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rulesSkipped
1.7 ms*
linter/all-with-preview-rules[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rulesSkipped
1.9 ms*
linter/all-rules[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rulesSkipped
7.5 ms*
Commits
Click on a commit to change the comparison rangeBase
main
bb40c34
-0.11%
[ty] rollback preferring declared type on invalid TypedDict creation
5d3ff98
4 months ago
by carljm