Comparing
alex/neg-intersection2
(ca5bd50
) withmain
(827d8ae
)0%
- Untouched
- 13
- Skipped
- 30
- Archived
- 9
Benchmarks
30 total
The benchmarks below were skipped, so their baseline results are used instead. If they were deleted in your codebase, archive them to remove them from the performance reports.
Learn more about archiving benchmarks
Learn more about archiving benchmarks
formatter[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatterSkipped
234.5 µs*
lexer[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexerSkipped
217.4 µs*
linter/all-with-preview-rules[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rulesSkipped
19.6 ms*
lexer[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexerSkipped
28.8 µs*
linter/default-rules[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rulesSkipped
393.4 µs*
lexer[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexerSkipped
1.1 ms*
lexer[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexerSkipped
486.1 µs*
formatter[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatterSkipped
3.5 ms*
formatter[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatterSkipped
1.9 ms*
lexer[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexerSkipped
74.6 µs*
formatter[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatterSkipped
651.9 µs*
linter/all-rules[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rulesSkipped
16.2 ms*
linter/all-rules[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rulesSkipped
3.9 ms*
linter/all-with-preview-rules[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rulesSkipped
4.6 ms*
linter/all-rules[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rulesSkipped
649.2 µs*
linter/all-with-preview-rules[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rulesSkipped
739 µs*
linter/all-rules[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rulesSkipped
7.5 ms*
linter/all-with-preview-rules[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rulesSkipped
1.9 ms*
linter/all-with-preview-rules[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rulesSkipped
9 ms*
linter/all-rules[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rulesSkipped
1.7 ms*
linter/default-rules[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rulesSkipped
4.2 ms*
parser[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parserSkipped
4.9 ms*
parser[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parserSkipped
105 µs*
parser[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parserSkipped
920.2 µs*
parser[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parserSkipped
1.9 ms*
Commits
Click on a commit to change the comparison rangeBase
main
827d8ae
-0.01%
[ty] Improve exhaustiveness analysis for type variables with bounds or constraints
ca5bd50
3 months ago
by AlexWaygood