Avatar for the astral-sh user
astral-sh
ruff
BlogDocsChangelog

ruff_python_formatter: support reformatting Markdown code blocks

#9030Merged
Comparing
ag/fmt/markdown
(
d838fa1
) with
main
(
b021ede
)
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
Improvements
0
Regressions
0
Untouched
30
New
0
Dropped
0
Ignored
0

Benchmarks

Passed

linter/default-rules[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rules::linter/default-rules[pydantic/types.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
+4%
6.9 ms
6.7 ms
linter/default-rules[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rules::linter/default-rules[numpy/globals.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
+2%
440.5 µs
431.3 µs
linter/all-rules[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rules::linter/all-rules[pydantic/types.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
+2%
13.9 ms
13.6 ms
linter/all-rules[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rules::linter/all-rules[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
+2%
6.9 ms
6.7 ms
linter/all-rules[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rules::linter/all-rules[numpy/globals.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
+1%
951.7 µs
944.9 µs
linter/all-with-preview-rules[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rules::linter/all-with-preview-rules[numpy/globals.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
+1%
1 ms
1 ms
linter/default-rules[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rules::linter/default-rules[unicode/pypinyin.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
+1%
1.2 ms
1.2 ms
parser[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parser::parser[numpy/globals.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
252.7 µs
252.5 µs
formatter[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatter::formatter[large/dataset.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
9.5 ms
9.5 ms
lexer[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexer::lexer[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
310.3 µs
310.3 µs
linter/all-with-preview-rules[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rules::linter/all-with-preview-rules[pydantic/types.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
14.9 ms
14.9 ms
lexer[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexer::lexer[pydantic/types.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
624.8 µs
624.8 µs
lexer[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexer::lexer[numpy/globals.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
45.5 µs
45.5 µs
lexer[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexer::lexer[unicode/pypinyin.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
98.5 µs
98.5 µs
lexer[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/lexer.rs::lexer::benchmark_lexer::lexer[large/dataset.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
1.4 ms
1.4 ms
linter/all-rules[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rules::linter/all-rules[large/dataset.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
30.6 ms
30.6 ms
formatter[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatter::formatter[pydantic/types.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
3.5 ms
3.5 ms
formatter[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatter::formatter[unicode/pypinyin.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
676.4 µs
676.5 µs
linter/all-with-preview-rules[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rules::linter/all-with-preview-rules[unicode/pypinyin.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
3.6 ms
3.6 ms
formatter[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatter::formatter[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
1.9 ms
1.9 ms
linter/all-with-preview-rules[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rules::linter/all-with-preview-rules[large/dataset.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
34.2 ms
34.2 ms
parser[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parser::parser[large/dataset.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
12.3 ms
12.3 ms
linter/all-rules[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::all_rules::benchmark_all_rules::linter/all-rules[unicode/pypinyin.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
3.4 ms
3.4 ms
linter/all-with-preview-rules[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::preview_rules::benchmark_preview_rules::linter/all-with-preview-rules[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
7.3 ms
7.3 ms
parser[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parser::parser[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
2.2 ms
2.2 ms
formatter[numpy/globals.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::benchmark_formatter::formatter[numpy/globals.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
253.5 µs
254 µs
parser[pydantic/types.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parser::parser[pydantic/types.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
0%
4.8 ms
4.8 ms
linter/default-rules[large/dataset.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rules::linter/default-rules[large/dataset.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
-1%
16.4 ms
16.4 ms
parser[unicode/pypinyin.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/parser.rs::parser::benchmark_parser::parser[unicode/pypinyin.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
-1%
789.7 µs
797.8 µs
linter/default-rules[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
crates/ruff_benchmark/benches/linter.rs::default_rules::benchmark_default_rules::linter/default-rules[numpy/ctypeslib.py]
CodSpeed Performance Gauge
-3%
3.2 ms
3.3 ms

Commits

Click on a commit to change the comparison range
Base
main
b021ede
0%
ruff_python_formatter: support reformatting Markdown code blocks This commit slots in support for formatting Markdown fenced code blocks[1]. With the refactoring done for reStructuredText previously, this ended up being pretty easy to add. Markdown code blocks are also quite a bit easier to parse and recognize correctly. One point of contention in #8860 is whether to assume that unlabeled Markdown code fences are Python or not by default. In this PR, we make such an assumption. This follows what `rustdoc` does. The mitigation here is that if an unlabeled code block isn't Python, then it probably won't parse as Python. And we'll end up skipping it. So in the vast majority of cases, the worst thing that can happen is a little bit of wasted work. Closes #8860 [1]: https://spec.commonmark.org/0.30/#fenced-code-blocks
d838fa1
1 year ago
by BurntSushi
© 2025 CodSpeed Technology
Home Terms PrivacyDocs