ocdbytes:aj/opt/proof-size-v1 - Branch - WizardOfMenlo/whir

Opt : smaller proof size by using alternate randomness sampling approach (audit branch : v1)

#239

Comparing

ocdbytes:aj/opt/proof-size-v1

(

3e9ba44

) with

(

790bdf0

)

-24%

Regression: 4

Untouched: 6

Skipped: 22

No successful run was found on v1 ( 37fef3f) during the generation of this report, so main ( 790bdf0) was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments, which may affect the accuracy of the results. Learn more about regression causes.

Benchmarks

32 total

interleaved_rs_encode[(20, 4, 4)]

benches/expand_from_coeff.rs

-24%

612.9 ms807.8 ms

interleaved_rs_encode[(18, 2, 2)]

benches/expand_from_coeff.rs

-20%

68.8 ms86.2 ms

interleaved_rs_encode[(22, 4, 4)]

benches/expand_from_coeff.rs

-17%

3.4 s4.1 s

interleaved_rs_encode[(18, 4, 3)]

benches/expand_from_coeff.rs

-14%

155.2 ms179.8 ms

sumcheck_first_round[262144]

benches/sumcheck.rs

6.9 ms6.9 ms

sumcheck_first_round[1048576]

benches/sumcheck.rs

34.3 ms34.3 ms

sumcheck_first_round[65536]

benches/sumcheck.rs

-1%

1.8 ms1.8 ms

interleaved_rs_encode[(16, 2, 2)]

benches/expand_from_coeff.rs

-3%

16.9 ms17.4 ms

interleaved_rs_encode[(16, 4, 3)]

benches/expand_from_coeff.rs

-3%

32.4 ms33.4 ms

interleaved_rs_encode[(20, 2, 3)]

benches/expand_from_coeff.rs

-8%

373.1 ms407.6 ms

The benchmarks below were skipped, so their baseline results are used instead. If they were deleted in your codebase, archive them to remove them from the performance reports.
Learn more about archiving benchmarks

expand_from_coeff[(20, 2)]

benches/expand_from_coeff.rs

Skipped

69 ms*

expand_from_coeff[(24, 4)]

benches/expand_from_coeff.rs

Skipped

2.8 s*

sumcheck_first_round[67108864]

benches/sumcheck.rs

Skipped

1.2 s*

expand_from_coeff[(20, 4)]

benches/expand_from_coeff.rs

Skipped

144.3 ms*

sumcheck_first_round[1048576]

benches/sumcheck.rs

Skipped

9.5 ms*

expand_from_coeff[(26, 4)]

benches/expand_from_coeff.rs

Skipped

13 s*

expand_from_coeff[(18, 4)]

benches/expand_from_coeff.rs

Skipped

26.2 ms*

expand_from_coeff[(26, 2)]

benches/expand_from_coeff.rs

Skipped

6.5 s*

sumcheck_first_round[262144]

benches/sumcheck.rs

Skipped

4.7 ms*

expand_from_coeff[(18, 2)]

benches/expand_from_coeff.rs

Skipped

18.2 ms*

sumcheck_first_round[65536]

benches/sumcheck.rs

Skipped

866.3 µs*

expand_from_coeff[(22, 4)]

benches/expand_from_coeff.rs

Skipped

662.4 ms*

expand_from_coeff[(22, 2)]

benches/expand_from_coeff.rs

Skipped

333.9 ms*

sumcheck_first_round[16777216]

benches/sumcheck.rs

Skipped

266.6 ms*

expand_from_coeff[(24, 2)]

benches/expand_from_coeff.rs

Skipped

1.4 s*

Commits

Click on a commit to change the comparison range

Base

main

790bdf0

-0.05%

fix : code quality issues

77340f3

8 days ago

by ocdbytes

-24.08%

comments resolved

40aaa69

1 day ago

by ocdbytes

feat : added edge case tests for zk whir and refactor code

77baf59

24 hours ago

by ocdbytes

refactor : replaced test names from zk2 to zk in whir zk module

3e9ba44

22 hours ago

by ocdbytes

Home Terms Privacy Docs