vtjnash:fix-libnamesuffix-handling - Branch - OpenMathLib/OpenBLAS

build: Fix LIBNAMESUFFIX handling in CMake documentation

#5583

Comparing

vtjnash:fix-libnamesuffix-handling

(

4026d7b

) with

develop

(

097d2d9

)

Untouched: 62

Benchmarks

Passed

test_daxpy[1000-d]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

+1%

32.5 µs32.3 µs

test_daxpy[1000-s]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

+1%

27.6 µs27.5 µs

test_daxpy[100-z]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

25.9 µs25.9 µs

test_daxpy[100-d]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

24.3 µs24.3 µs

test_gesv[100-d]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

394.1 µs393.7 µs

test_gesdd[mn1-s]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

65.2 ms65.2 ms

test_gesv[1000-z]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

353.6 ms353.4 ms

test_syev[200-d]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

58.6 ms58.6 ms

test_gesdd[mn0-s]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

109.3 µs109.2 µs

test_syev[50-d]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

1.4 ms1.4 ms

test_gesv[100-c]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

695.7 µs695.6 µs

test_gesdd[mn1-d]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

93.8 ms93.8 ms

test_syev[200-s]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

49.1 ms49.1 ms

test_dgemv[1000-d]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

13.9 ms13.9 ms

test_gemm[100-d]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

471.3 µs471.3 µs

test_dot[100]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

22.5 µs22.5 µs

test_dgemv[1000-s]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

7 ms7 ms

test_syrk[1000-c]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

227.6 ms227.5 ms

test_dgemv[1000-z]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

26.3 ms26.3 ms

test_gesv[1000-d]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

93.3 ms93.3 ms

test_syrk[1000-s]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

65.4 ms65.4 ms

test_gemm[1000-c]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

426 ms426 ms

test_syrk[1000-d]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

130.4 ms130.4 ms

test_gemm[1000-z]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

875.6 ms875.6 ms

test_gemm[1000-d]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

239.4 ms239.4 ms

test_syrk[1000-z]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

476.4 ms476.4 ms

test_gesv[100-s]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

256.8 µs256.8 µs

test_gesv[1000-c]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

188.6 ms188.6 ms

test_gemm[1000-s]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

117.4 ms117.4 ms

test_dgemv[1000-c]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

14.8 ms14.8 ms

test_gesv[1000-s]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

52.6 ms52.6 ms

test_gesv[100-z]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

937.9 µs938 µs

test_nrm2[100-d]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

38.2 µs38.2 µs

test_syrk[100-c]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

473.7 µs473.7 µs

test_gemm[100-z]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

1.2 ms1.2 ms

test_syev[50-s]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

1.3 ms1.3 ms

test_gemm[100-c]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

659.6 µs659.6 µs

test_nrm2[100-dz]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

28.8 µs28.8 µs

test_dgemv[100-c]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

149.3 µs149.3 µs

test_syrk[100-z]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

856.6 µs856.7 µs

test_syrk[100-s]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

213.4 µs213.4 µs

test_gemm[100-s]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

273.2 µs273.3 µs

test_dgbmv[1-1000-d]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

83.6 µs83.6 µs

test_dgemv[100-d]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

140.8 µs140.8 µs

test_syrk[100-d]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

341.2 µs341.4 µs

test_daxpy[1000-z]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

40.6 µs40.7 µs

test_daxpy[1000-c]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

32.8 µs32.8 µs

test_dgemv[100-s]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

104.1 µs104.2 µs

test_dgemv[100-z]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

231.3 µs231.5 µs

test_daxpy[100-c]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

25.1 µs25.2 µs

test_dot[1000]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

28.5 µs28.6 µs

test_daxpy[100-s]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

24.1 µs24.1 µs

test_dgbmv[1-1000-z]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

118.9 µs119.1 µs

test_dgbmv[1-1000-s]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

74.9 µs75.1 µs

test_nrm2[1000-d]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

30.4 µs30.5 µs

test_dgbmv[1-1000-c]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

99.4 µs99.7 µs

test_gesdd[mn0-d]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

120 µs120.3 µs

test_nrm2[1000-dz]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

35.3 µs35.4 µs

test_dgbmv[1-100-c]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

40.3 µs40.5 µs

test_dgbmv[1-100-z]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

42.2 µs42.4 µs

test_dgbmv[1-100-s]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

37.3 µs37.4 µs

test_dgbmv[1-100-d]

benchmark/pybench/benchmarks/bench_blas.py

-1%

37.9 µs38.1 µs

Commits

Click on a commit to change the comparison range

Base

develop

097d2d9

-0.03%

Fix LIBNAMESUFFIX handling in CMake and update documentation - Fix cmake/system.cmake: LIBPREFIX was incorrectly overwritten when LIBNAMESUFFIX was defined, losing both "lib" prefix and "openblas" - Fix Makefile.rule docs: typo used LIBNAMESUFFIX instead of LIBNAMEPREFIX - Fix Makefile.rule docs: removed misleading underscores from examples - Fix docs/build_system.md: removed incorrect claim about automatic underscore separator The implementation does not add an underscore before the suffix - users who want a separator should include it in their LIBNAMESUFFIX value (e.g., LIBNAMESUFFIX=_omp). 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

4026d7b

2 days ago

by vtjnash

Home Terms Privacy Docs