No successful run was found on main (f286c98) during the generation of this report, so 2e28cc3 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.
2 benchmarks with a significant change ran on different hardware
Their base and head results were measured on machines with a different CPU, core count or memory, so the changes might not come from the code. Run base and head on the same runner type.
System calls cannot be simulated consistently and are left out of the measure. The reported value understates the real cost. Switch to the Walltime instrument to measure them.
The benchmarks below were skipped, so their baseline results are used instead. If they were deleted in your codebase, archive them to remove them from the performance reports. Learn more about archiving benchmarks