Comparing
05-08-fix_traverse_handle_chainelement_tsnonnullexpression
(ad682e2
) withmain
(0eeceaf
)0%
- Untouched
- 44
- Skipped
- 7
No successful run was found on main ( ca8fb74) during the generation of this report, so 0eeceaf was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.
Benchmarks
7 total
The benchmarks below were skipped, so their baseline results are used instead. If they were deleted in your codebase, archive them to remove them from the performance reports.
Learn more about archiving benchmarks
Learn more about archiving benchmarks
formatter[binder.ts]
tasks/benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::bench_formatterSkipped
21.2 ms*
formatter[cal.com.tsx]
tasks/benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::bench_formatterSkipped
188.5 ms*
formatter[react.development.js]
tasks/benchmark/benches/formatter.rs::formatter::bench_formatterSkipped
10.7 ms*
linter[react.development.js]
tasks/benchmark/benches/linter.rs::linter::bench_linterSkipped
22.9 ms*
linter[binder.ts]
tasks/benchmark/benches/linter.rs::linter::bench_linterSkipped
58.4 ms*
linter[cal.com.tsx]
tasks/benchmark/benches/linter.rs::linter::bench_linterSkipped
575.9 ms*
linter[RadixUIAdoptionSection.jsx]
tasks/benchmark/benches/linter.rs::linter::bench_linterSkipped
843.1 µs*
Commits
Click on a commit to change the comparison rangeBase
main
0eeceaf
-0.04%
Apply suggestion from @camc314
27f587c
14 days ago
by leaysgur-0.01%
update snapshot
ad682e2
11 days ago
by camc314