Comparing
ndarray_from_list
(c776366
) withmain
(fa53fb6
)×2.2
- Improvements
- 7
- Regressions
- 0
- Untouched
- 5
- New
- 0
- Dropped
- 0
- Ignored
- 0
No successful run was found on main ( a0eaa37) during the generation of this report, so fa53fb6 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.
Benchmarks
Improved
test_sequence_cell[cpu-forward-lstm]
benchmarks/test_sequence_cells.py::test_sequence_cell[cpu-forward-lstm]×2.2
215.3 ms
98.8 ms
test_sequence_cell[cpu-backward-rnn]
benchmarks/test_sequence_cells.py::test_sequence_cell[cpu-backward-rnn]×2.1
12.4 ms
6 ms
test_sequence_cell[cpu-backward-lstm]
benchmarks/test_sequence_cells.py::test_sequence_cell[cpu-backward-lstm]+83%
13.4 s
7.3 s
test_sequence_cell[cpu-forward-rnn]
benchmarks/test_sequence_cells.py::test_sequence_cell[cpu-forward-rnn]+73%
4.4 ms
2.6 ms
test_conv[cpu-forward-image-like]
benchmarks/test_conv.py::test_conv[cpu-forward-image-like]+64%
2.2 s
1.3 s
test_matmul[cpu-64-64-64]
benchmarks/test_matmul.py::test_matmul[cpu-64-64-64]+49%
2.4 ms
1.6 ms
test_conv[cpu-backward-image-like]
benchmarks/test_conv.py::test_conv[cpu-backward-image-like]+44%
14.2 s
9.9 s
Passed
test_matmul[cpu-256-256-256]
benchmarks/test_matmul.py::test_matmul[cpu-256-256-256]+6%
84.4 ms
79.6 ms
test_matmul[cpu-128-128-128]
benchmarks/test_matmul.py::test_matmul[cpu-128-128-128]+4%
17.3 ms
16.6 ms
test_needle_import
benchmarks/test_import_time.py::test_needle_import+2%
134.6 µs
132.6 µs
test_matmul[cpu-512-512-512]
benchmarks/test_matmul.py::test_matmul[cpu-512-512-512]0%
513.7 ms
512.1 ms
test_matmul[cpu-8-8-8]
benchmarks/test_matmul.py::test_matmul[cpu-8-8-8]-2%
66.4 µs
67.9 µs
Commits
Click on a commit to change the comparison rangeBase
main
fa53fb6
+107%
fix: fix benchmark environment
0325c6b
6 days ago
by liskajiri+11%
fix: ndarray creation
c776366
6 days ago
by liskajiri