Comparing
validate-historical-blocks
(698ba6c
) withmaster
(e83f0ea
)0%
- Untouched
- 5
No successful run was found on master ( 698ba6c) during the generation of this report, so e83f0ea was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.
Benchmarks
5 total
wallet_history_1000_4
neptune-core/benchmark/benches/wallet_state.rs::wallet_state+2%
14.9 ms14.6 ms
wallet_status_for_tip_1000_4
neptune-core/benchmark/benches/wallet_state.rs::wallet_state0%
10.1 ms10 ms
coins_with_possible_timelocks_1000_4
neptune-core/benchmark/benches/wallet_state.rs::wallet_state0%
9.3 ms9.3 ms
set_new_tip_1000_4
neptune-core/benchmark/benches/wallet_state.rs::wallet_state0%
4.6 s4.6 s
spendable_inputs_1000_4
neptune-core/benchmark/benches/wallet_state.rs::wallet_state-1%
303.6 ms307 ms
Commits
Click on a commit to change the comparison rangeBase
master
e83f0ea
-0.23%
test: Test new revalidation method with early blocks
20019d5
5 days ago
by Sword-Smith+0.38%
softfork: Add extra check of tx/block consistency
698ba6c
5 days ago
by Sword-Smith