Comparing
renovate/python-3.x
(032e6b3
) withmaster
(3cae667
)N/A
- Skipped
- 619
No successful run was found on master ( 1f07526) during the generation of this report, so 3cae667 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.
Benchmarks
619 total
The benchmarks below were skipped, so their baseline results are used instead. If they were deleted in your codebase, archive them to remove them from the performance reports.
Learn more about archiving benchmarks
Learn more about archiving benchmarks
test_faster_to_bytes['0x'+'ff'*32]
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
125.7 µs*
test_faster_hexstr_to_bytes['0x'+'0'*128]
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
141.2 µs*
test_faster_hexstr_to_bytes['']
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
72.4 µs*
test_faster_hexstr_to_bytes['0x'+'00'*64]
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
141.1 µs*
test_faster_to_bytes['0x1234']
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
109 µs*
test_faster_hexstr_to_bytes['0x'+'00ff'*16]
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
122.3 µs*
test_faster_hexstr_to_bytes['0x'+'0123456789abcdef'*8]
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
141.1 µs*
test_faster_hexstr_to_bytes['0x'+'1'*64]
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
122.3 µs*
test_faster_to_bytes['0xCAFEBABE']
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
110.1 µs*
test_faster_to_bytes['0xdeadbeef']
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
110.2 µs*
test_faster_to_bytes['0x']
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
76.9 µs*
test_faster_hexstr_to_bytes['0x'+'1234567890abcdef'*8]
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
141.1 µs*
test_faster_to_bytes['0xabcdef']
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
109.8 µs*
test_faster_hexstr_to_bytes['0x'+'beef'*16]
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
122.4 µs*
test_faster_hexstr_to_bytes['0x'+'a'*128]
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
141.1 µs*
test_faster_hexstr_to_bytes['0x'+'a1b2c3d4'*8]
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
122.7 µs*
test_faster_to_bytes['abc']
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
117.6 µs*
test_faster_to_bytes['deadbeef']
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
99.4 µs*
test_faster_hexstr_to_bytes['0x'+'b'*2048]
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
728.3 µs*
test_faster_to_bytes[123456]
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
186.6 µs*
test_faster_to_bytes[0]
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
162 µs*
test_faster_hexstr_to_bytes['0x'+'badc0ffee0ddf00d'*4]
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
122.3 µs*
test_faster_hexstr_to_bytes['0x'+'c'*1024]
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
418.3 µs*
test_faster_to_bytes[0-9]
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
37.8 µs*
test_faster_to_bytes[2**32]
benchmarks/test__utils_benchmarks.pySkipped
193.8 µs*
Commits
Click on a commit to change the comparison rangeNo baseline data is yet availableOnce your main branch has generated a first performance report, you will see the list of commits and their performance impact here.