Comparing
feat/1982-cost-dial
(a0c612a
) withmain
(d2207e9
)0%
- Untouched
- 54
Benchmarks
54 total
test_classify_severity
tests/benchmarks/test_budget_optimizer.py+2%
15.2 µs14.9 µs
test_rate_efficiency
tests/benchmarks/test_budget_optimizer.py+2%
16.9 µs16.6 µs
test_sum_cost_2000
tests/benchmarks/test_budget_aggregation.py+1%
1.8 ms1.8 ms
test_coerce_row_timestamp_string
tests/benchmarks/test_persistence_datetime.py+1%
21 µs20.8 µs
test_diversity_penalty_50
tests/benchmarks/test_memory_ranking.py+1%
16.5 ms16.4 ms
test_parse_iso_utc_single
tests/benchmarks/test_persistence_datetime.py+1%
17 µs16.9 µs
test_compute_efficiency
tests/benchmarks/test_coordination_metrics.py0%
35.2 µs35.1 µs
test_fuse_ranked_lists_3x100
tests/benchmarks/test_memory_ranking.py0%
1.8 ms1.8 ms
formatTokenCount x100
web/src/__tests__/benchmarks/format.bench.ts::format helpers0%
10.8 ms*10.8 ms
test_compute_straggler_gap_20_agents
tests/benchmarks/test_coordination_metrics.py0%
149.1 µs148.5 µs
test_compute_token_speedup_ratio
tests/benchmarks/test_coordination_metrics.py0%
38.9 µs38.7 µs
formatNumber x100
web/src/__tests__/benchmarks/format.bench.ts::format helpers0%
9.5 ms*9.5 ms
test_agent_task_scorer_batch_10
tests/benchmarks/test_routing_scorer.py0%
1.5 ms1.5 ms
test_format_iso_utc_batch_96
tests/benchmarks/test_persistence_datetime.py0%
453.3 µs452.2 µs
test_normalize_utc
tests/benchmarks/test_persistence_datetime.py0%
12.4 µs12.4 µs
test_coerce_row_timestamp_datetime
tests/benchmarks/test_persistence_datetime.py0%
24.5 µs24.4 µs
test_format_iso_utc_single
tests/benchmarks/test_persistence_datetime.py0%
31.1 µs31.1 µs
test_compute_window_costs_12
tests/benchmarks/test_budget_optimizer.py0%
350.5 µs349.9 µs
formatCurrencyCompact x100
web/src/__tests__/benchmarks/format.bench.ts::format helpers0%
12.8 ms*12.8 ms
test_parse_iso_utc_batch_96
tests/benchmarks/test_persistence_datetime.py0%
149.3 µs149.1 µs
test_agent_task_scorer_single
tests/benchmarks/test_routing_scorer.py0%
310.5 µs310.1 µs
test_sum_tokens_2000
tests/benchmarks/test_budget_aggregation.py0%
1.6 ms1.6 ms
test_rank_memories_1000
tests/benchmarks/test_memory_ranking.py0%
16.4 ms16.4 ms
test_bigram_jaccard_long
tests/benchmarks/test_memory_ranking.py0%
238.4 µs238.2 µs
Commits
Click on a commit to change the comparison rangeBase
main
d2207e9
+0.3%
fix: address pre-PR review findings for cost dial
acc7d75
6 days ago
by Aureliolo-0.04%
fix: address Gemini review on cost-dial (503 consistency, TaskGroup fan-out, supersede decided_at, redundant UUID conversions)
87c3e34
6 days ago
by Aureliolo-0.1%
fix: use sub-daily-limit cost in hard-ceiling disablement test
1ebff72
6 days ago
by Aureliolo+0.09%
fix: reuse pending forecast covering the brief instead of minting a duplicate
0178d6f
6 days ago
by Aureliolo+0.13%
fix: reuse existing pending forecast by brief_hash even without a caller-supplied id
3e43d3d
6 days ago
by Aureliolo-0.17%
fix: recover forecast_gate save race via re-query and slim run() under 50 lines
40d76a3
6 days ago
by Aureliolo-0.06%
test: clarify stale-linked-forecast gate test name and assertions
a0c612a
6 days ago
by Aureliolo